I’m still chasing up peer review of data. My it’s hard to find anything useful in the peer reviewed literature on the subject, or indeed on the wider Internet …

Meanwhile, I came across this:

... Of course if the papers that mislead us had links to the raw data of their experiments we would have been able to spot these errors much more quickly. This is a huge advantage of doing open source science.
With the proliferation of new forms of scholarship, it is no longer effective to teach our students that there is such a thing as reliable literature. There is uncertainty in every information source ...

It would be helpful if even (or maybe ESPECIALLY) the raw data came with information that would help assess it’s reliability and uncertainty …